Skip to content

AFIT-11 - Implementation of FEE configuration object - #15888

Draft
wpierozak wants to merge 29 commits into
AliceO2Group:devfrom
wpierozak:AFIT-11
Draft

wpierozak wants to merge 29 commits into
AliceO2Group:devfrom
wpierozak:AFIT-11

Conversation

@wpierozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Implementation of FEE configuration CCDB object and DCS workflow that fetches JSON from DCS and transforms it to the CCDB object

wpieroza and others added 25 commits August 5, 2026 07:16
…static memory corruption issue in HV schema; fixed schema issues in both FEE and HV
…to FITDCSConfigProcessor, added back DeadChannelMap definition in link file'
// granted to it by virtue of its status as an Intergovernmental Organization
// or submit itself to any jurisdiction.

// \file FeeConfiguration.h

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

correct filename in comments

uint16_t adcDelays[NChannels];
uint16_t rangeCorrectionAdc0[NChannels];
uint16_t rangeCorrectionAdc1[NChannels];
uint16_t thresholdCalibration[NChannels];

@sahilupadhyaya92 sahilupadhyaya92 Oct 18, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thresholdCalibration is not included later in operator==(const ChannelsConfig& other) comparison and also not defined as a getter. Any specific reasons ?


template <int NChannels>
struct ChannelsConfig {
int16_t timeAligments[NChannels];

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Spelling of "Alignment" is incorrect almost throughout the draft.

o2::fit::ChannelsConfig<NChannels> channels;
o2::fit::TcmConfig tcm;
o2::fit::PmConfig pmA[10];
o2::fit::PmConfig pmC[10];

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we keep this array of 10 or make it 12 ?
It is your choice, because probably we will not use all 12 channels ever..
But I was thinking if, just in case, there are some tests later then we can have a matching size of array with the no. of PM channels.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why would you make it 12? There are at most 10 PM modules per side

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants