Repository navigation
Array(Nested(...)) columns silently decode as Array(Nothing) and desynchronize the native block stream #571
Description
Description
The type parser has no entry for Nested, so a column whose server-reported type is Array(Nested(key String, value String)) is parsed as Array(<unknown terminal>) with Type::Void, and CreateTerminalColumn() maps Type::Void to ColumnNothing. The result is that CreateColumnByType() returns a perfectly valid-looking ColumnArray(ColumnNothing) — no error, no nullptr — and Client::Select() happily accepts it when reading the block header.
This matters because Nested inside Array(...) is not flattened by the server. Unlike a top-level Nested column (which the server splits into col.key Array(String), col.value Array(String) — the case discussed in #40), Array(Nested(...)) is reported over the native protocol with the literal type name:
$ clickhouse-client -q "SELECT name, type FROM system.columns WHERE table='some_data'"
id UInt64
data Array(Nested(key String, value String))
On the wire Array(Nested(k String, v String)) is serialized as Array(Array(Tuple(String, String))). But the client builds Array(Nothing), and ColumnNothing::LoadBody() (clickhouse/columns/nothing.h:61) just does input->Skip(rows) — 1 byte per element. So after reading the outer offsets the client skips N bytes where the server actually wrote 8*N inner-offset bytes plus all the string data. The input stream is desynchronized from that point on: the remaining block (and every block after it) is decoded as garbage, typically surfacing much later as an unrelated parse failure or a corrupted/empty result rather than a clear "unsupported type" error.
This is the C++ analogue of ClickHouse/clickhouse-java#3178, where the JDBC driver also failed on Array(Nested(...)) because its conversion layer did not account for Nested producing an extra list level.
Related but distinct from #40, which asks for a convenience API over flattened top-level Nested columns (those already work, since the server hands them over as plain Array(T)). Here the client receives a literal Nested(...) type name and silently produces wrong data.
ClickHouse server version
26.9.8.3 — used to confirm the type name the server reports for Array(Nested(...)) (shown above).
Code analysis only; the C++ repro below was written but not executed — binary execution was unavailable in the environment I investigated from. The static trace through TypeParser::Parse → CreateColumnFromAst → CreateTerminalColumn is given in full under "Suggested fix" below, and the first assertion (Array(Nothing)) is a pure parser/factory fact requiring no server.
Reproduction
Pure client-side, no server needed — this already demonstrates the root cause:
#include <clickhouse/columns/factory.h>
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
using namespace clickhouse;
TEST(CreateColumnByType, ArrayOfNested) {
auto col = CreateColumnByType("Array(Nested(key String, value String))");
ASSERT_NE(nullptr, col);
// Expected: Array(Array(Tuple(String, String)))
// Actual: Array(Nothing)
EXPECT_EQ("Array(Array(Tuple(String, String)))", col->Type()->GetName());
}End-to-end, against a server:
CREATE TABLE some_data (
`id` UInt64,
`data` Array(Nested(`key` String, `value` String))
) ENGINE = Memory;
INSERT INTO some_data VALUES
(1, [[('key1','test'), ('key2','another-test')], [('key1','more-data')]]);#include <clickhouse/client.h>
#include <iostream>
using namespace clickhouse;
int main() {
Client client(ClientOptions().SetHost("localhost").SetPort(9000));
client.Select("SELECT id, data FROM some_data", [](const Block& block) {
for (size_t c = 0; c < block.GetColumnCount(); ++c) {
std::cout << block.GetColumnName(c) << " -> "
<< block[c]->Type()->GetName() << "\n";
}
});
}Expected: the data column comes back as Array(Array(Tuple(String, String))) with the two inner arrays intact (or, failing that, a clear UnimplementedError naming the unsupported type).
Actual: data is reported as Array(Nothing) carrying no values, and because ColumnNothing::LoadBody under-consumes the stream by the full size of the inner offsets and strings, decoding of the rest of the response is corrupted.
Suggested fix
Trace of the current behaviour:
clickhouse/types/type_parser.cpp:116—GetTypeMeta()has noNestedbranch, so theNested(...)node falls through toTypeAst::Terminal.clickhouse/types/type_parser.cpp:107—GetTypeCode("Nested")misseskTypeCodeand returnsType::Void.clickhouse/types/type_parser.cpp:152—ValidateAST()does reject unknownTerminal+Voidnodes, but it is only ever called on the root AST node (type_parser.cpp:238). The root here isArray, so the bad child is never validated.clickhouse/columns/factory.cpp:49—CreateTerminalColumn()mapsType::VoidtoColumnNothing, turning the unknown type into a silently-wrong column instead of anullptr.
Two things worth doing, independently useful:
-
Support
Nested.Nested(a T1, b T2)is exactlyArray(Tuple(a T1, b T2)). Adding aNestedmeta that desugars to that inCreateColumnFromAstwould makeArray(Nested(...))decode correctly, and would also let named-tuple element names (already supported viaTypeAst::element_name) carry through. -
Fail loudly on unknown nested types. Apply
ValidateASTrecursively, or haveCreateTerminalColumnreturnnullptrforType::Voidwhenast.nameis not literallyNothing/void. Right now any unrecognized type nested inside a container degrades toColumnNothingand desynchronizes the stream rather than raisingUnimplementedError. (Same silent-desync failure mode as ColumnArray::AppendAsColumn silently accepts a wrong-typed element column, writes zero data bytes and desynchronizes the native block stream #543.)
Link
Original client issue: ClickHouse/clickhouse-java#3178
Activity
Hakaou commentedon Oct 17, 2026
I can reproduce this on
master(fc5d98f) against ClickHouse 26.11:CreateColumnByType("Array(Nested(key String, value String))")returnsArray(Void), and aSelecton such a column throwsCan't cast from Voidwithout compression, orsome data was not readwith LZ4. Withflatten_nested = 0a top-levelNestedcolumn fails earlier withunsupported column type: Nested(...).I'm taking it: the parser will know
Nestedas its own node and the column factory will build anArrayof the namedTuplefrom it, which is how the server defines it (src/DataTypes/DataTypeNested.cppbuilds aDataTypeArrayof a namedDataTypeTupleunder a custom name). Opened #575 for it. The second point of the suggested fix, unknown type names inside a container, is tracked separately in #589, with a draft in #590.Create Nested(...) columns as Array(Tuple(...))
Create Nested(...) columns as Array(Tuple(...))
Create Nested(...) columns as Array(Tuple(...))
Create Nested(...) columns as Array(Tuple(...))
Create Nested(...) columns as Array(Tuple(...))
Create Nested(...) columns as Array(Tuple(...))