Repository navigation
Manchester | 26-ITP-Sept | Fatima Rouchi | Sprint 2 | Implement and rewrite tests #1728
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
e275bbf
18c03c0
a19670a
f5bf95b
6c865ba
37f4f78
12f4893
f47f802
d58fb5e
c9cc257
eaa3920
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -24,5 +24,26 @@ | |
| // execute the code to ensure all tests pass. | ||
|
|
||
| export function getCardValue(card) { | ||
| // TODO: Implement this function | ||
| const suit = card.slice(-1); | ||
| const rank = card.slice(0, -1); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!["♠", "♥", "♦", "♣"].includes(suit)) { | ||
| throw new Error(`Expected a number followed by a suit, but got "${card}"`); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (rank === "A") { | ||
| return 11; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (rank === "J" || rank === "Q" || rank === "K") { | ||
| return 10; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const value = Number(rank); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!isNaN(value) && value >= 2 && value <= 10) { | ||
| return value; | ||
| } | ||
|
Comment on lines
+41
to
+46
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. In JavaScript, strings that represent valid numeric literals in the language can be safely converted to equivalent numbers. For examples, "0x02", "2.1", or "0002". Does your function return the value you expected from each of the following function calls? |
||
|
|
||
| throw new Error(`Expected a number followed by a suit, but got "${card}"`); | ||
| } | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -12,7 +12,30 @@ test(`should return "Acute angle" when (0 < angle < 90)`, () => { | |
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Case 2: Right angle | ||
| test('should return "right angle" when angle is 90', () => { | ||
| expect(getAngleType(90)).toEqual("Right angle"); | ||
| }); | ||
| // Case 3: Obtuse angles | ||
| test('should return "Obtuse angle" when (90 < angle < 180)', () => { | ||
| expect(getAngleType(91)).toEqual("Obtuse angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(120)).toEqual("Obtuse angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(179)).toEqual("Obtuse angle"); | ||
| }); | ||
| // Case 4: Straight angle | ||
| test('should return "Straight angle" when angle is 180', () => { | ||
| expect(getAngleType(180)).toEqual("Straight angle"); | ||
| }); | ||
| // Case 5: Reflex angles | ||
| test('should return "Reflex angle" when (180 < angle < 360)', () => { | ||
| expect(getAngleType(181)).toEqual("Reflex angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(270)).toEqual("Reflex angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(359)).toEqual("Reflex angle"); | ||
| }); | ||
| // Case 6: Invalid angles | ||
|
|
||
| test('should return "Invalid angle" for invalid angles', () => { | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. An exact range of invalid angles could probably make the test description more informative. |
||
| expect(getAngleType(-1)).toEqual("Invalid angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(0)).toEqual("Invalid angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(360)).toEqual("Invalid angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(400)).toEqual("Invalid angle"); | ||
| }); | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -6,3 +6,30 @@ import { isProperFraction } from "../implement/2-is-proper-fraction.js"; | |
| test(`should return false when denominator is zero`, () => { | ||
| expect(isProperFraction(1, 0)).toEqual(false); | ||
| }); | ||
| test("should return true for a proper fraction", () => { | ||
| expect(isProperFraction(1, 2)).toEqual(true); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("should return false when numerator equals denominator", () => { | ||
| expect(isProperFraction(5, 5)).toEqual(false); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("should return false when numerator is greater than denominator", () => { | ||
| expect(isProperFraction(7, 3)).toEqual(false); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("should return true when numerator is zero", () => { | ||
| expect(isProperFraction(0, 5)).toEqual(true); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("should return false for negative numerator and denominator", () => { | ||
| expect(isProperFraction(-1, -2)).toEqual(false); | ||
| }); | ||
|
Comment on lines
+25
to
+27
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. May I ask which authoritative source you used for the definition of a proper fraction? In math
|
||
|
|
||
| test("should return true for negative numerator and positive denominator", () => { | ||
| expect(isProperFraction(-1, 2)).toEqual(true); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("should return false for positive numerator and negative denominator", () => { | ||
| expect(isProperFraction(1, -2)).toEqual(false); | ||
| }); | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -9,10 +9,34 @@ test(`Should return 11 when given an ace card`, () => { | |
|
|
||
| // Suggestion: Group the remaining test data into these categories: | ||
| // Number Cards (2-10) | ||
| test("Should return 2 when given a 2 card", () => { | ||
| expect(getCardValue("2♠")).toEqual(2); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("Should return 10 when given a 10 card", () => { | ||
| expect(getCardValue("10♠")).toEqual(10); | ||
| }); | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. When preparing tests, we should ensure the tests cover all possible cases. If we specify a test for individual rank, we will need about 13 tests to cover all possible cases. Instead, we could consider classifying all possible values into different categories, and then within each category we test some samples. For example, one possible category for Can you practice preparing tests in this fashion? |
||
| // Face Cards (J, Q, K) | ||
| test("Should return 10 when given a Jack", () => { | ||
| expect(getCardValue("J♠")).toEqual(10); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("Should return 10 when given a Queen", () => { | ||
| expect(getCardValue("Q♠")).toEqual(10); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("Should return 10 when given a King", () => { | ||
| expect(getCardValue("K♠")).toEqual(10); | ||
| }); | ||
| // Invalid Cards | ||
| test("Should throw an error for invalid text", () => { | ||
| expect(() => getCardValue("invalid")).toThrow(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("Should throw an error when suit is missing", () => { | ||
| expect(() => getCardValue("A")).toThrow(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
Comment on lines
+32
to
+38
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. When testing invalid inputs, focus on edge cases that the function might overlook. Inputs that closely resemble valid card values are especially useful. For example, Can you think of other test cases that resemble valid card values but are still invalid? An empty string ( |
||
|
|
||
| // To learn how to test whether a function throws an error as expected in Jest, | ||
| // please refer to the Jest documentation: | ||
| // https://jestjs.io/docs/expect#tothrowerror | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note:
Negative angles means
angle < 0but0is also invalid. So you could consider specifyingwhen angle <= 0instead.The description "greater than 360" does not include
360.>= 360is "greater than or equal to 360".