Skip to content

quic: reuse header support assertion - #66777

Open
efekrskl wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
efekrskl:quic/reuse-assertion
Open

efekrskl wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
efekrskl:quic/reuse-assertion

Conversation

@efekrskl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Minor code cleanup by using the existing assertion so they don't drift

Signed-off-by: Efe Karasakal <hi@efe.dev>
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/quic

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. quic Issues and PRs related to the QUIC transport implementation. labels Oct 15, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.49%. Comparing base (68df1db) to head (e0a7eb3).
⚠️ Report is 32 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #66777      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.47%   90.49%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         791      797       +6     
  Lines      277225   277586     +361     
  Branches    53317    53330      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits       250817   251210     +393     
+ Misses      16811    16784      -27     
+ Partials     9597     9592       -5     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/internal/quic/quic.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 60 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. quic Issues and PRs related to the QUIC transport implementation.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants